Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 479-496. [ Links ]
Attraction and close relationships
Baxter, L. A., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: A dialectical perspective. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and emotion. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 143-161). New York: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test best hookup bar Sioux Falls SD of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173-189. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education (Prentice Hall). [ Links ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Task performance and attributional communication as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed. Pp. 193-281). New York: McGraw-Hill. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, May 11). Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship. U.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Nov. 18). Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship. U.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 884-889. [ Links ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), For modern-day Cupids, data replaces dating: Psychological science is behind the successful matches made at eHarmony. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 18. Downloaded from [ Links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Enhancing mate selection through the Internet: A comparison of relationship quality between marriages arising from an online matchmaking system and marriages arising from unfettered selection. [ Links ]
Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Helping singles enter better marriages using predictive models of marital success. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society. [ Links ]
C). How does personality matter in ination of trait anxiety, negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 326-336. [ Links ]
Clark, M. S. (1985). Implications of relationship type for understanding compatibility. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 119-140). New York: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in dating aspiration and satisfaction with computer-arranged partners. Journal of ily, 28, 62-66. [ Links ]
Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 3, 105-125
Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7-14. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do people know what they want: A similar or complementary partner? Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]
Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with a romantic partner. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 263-280. [ Links ]
