Dining table dos
Blacks and you will Latinos got higher internalized homophobia than just Whites (but this is mathematically tall to possess Latinos only), males got almost the same accounts which have females, and the ones connected to non-affirming religious settings had highest degrees of internalized homophobia compared to those associated with affirming options and those who never ever went to anyway. One of LGBs attending inside non-affirming options, those people whoever attendance regularity is actually above the median had higher profile from internalized homophobia than others beneath the median (however, which improvement was not mathematically significant). Into the abilities perhaps not revealed, the differences ranging from Blacks and you can Latinos, t(232) = ?step one.15, p = 0.25, between men and women, t(353) = 0.64, p = 0.52, and anywhere between men and women likely to in affirming options (Yards = step 1.25, SD = 0.35) and people never gonna (Meters = step 1.31, SD = 0.40), t(170) = ?0.88, p = 0.39, have been discovered to be not statistically significant.
Religiosity and you will Internalized Homophobia
To evaluate all of our hypotheses, we utilized ordinary minimum squares numerous linear regression analyses throughout circumstances except that; whenever comparison next step in our mediational theory i utilized logistic regression because these outcomes (the hypothesized mediators) was indeed dichotomous. All of the regression analyses controlled for a position, websites well worth, and education.
Consistent with our theory, players just who attended when you look at the non-affirming spiritual settings had notably large internalized homophobia than others whom attended during the affirming configurations and those who never ever went to but i discovered no assistance for the hypothesis out of regularity out-of attendance – those who attended within the low-affirming spiritual setup more often don’t disagree when you look at the quantities of internalized homophobia compared to those exactly who went to smaller appear to ( Dining table dos ). From inside the results not revealed, each other non-affirming association, B = 0.01, t(349) = 0.fifteen, p = 0.89, and you can volume out-of attendance in low-affirming settings, B = 0.03, t(177) = 0.43, p = 0.67, have been unrelated so you’re able to thinking-regard, indicating that habits out-of low-affirming religious exposures and internalized homophobia are certain to your feel regarding him- otherwise by herself while the a homosexual, lesbian, otherwise bisexual people and not so you can global care about-value.
We hypothesized that Blacks and you will Latinos will get large internalized homophobia than Whites because of deeper exposure to non-affirming faith ( Desk step 3 ; coverage is defined each other since the association and you will regularity). I used Kenny, Kashy, and you may Bolger’s (1998) four-action process to check to own evidence of mediation. Step one of this mediation test should be to find out if the new publicity interesting keeps a critical connection to your results of attention, maybe not managing on mediator. Data said in the Dining table 2 implies that both Blacks and you can Latinos had higher internalized homophobia than just Whites nevertheless the difference try statistically high getting Latinos simply, and so the test away from mediation perform affect Latinos only. I nonetheless incorporated data getting Blacks in the subsequent models observe when your guidelines from organization were in line with the theory. Throughout the second step, we indicated that, in contrast to Whites, Blacks and you may Latinos provides deeper 
connection with non-affirming religion (one another association and you can volume out-of attendance; Table step three , designs 1 and step 3). Regarding the step three we indicated that one another possible mediators anticipate internalized homophobia, dealing with having competition/ethnic classification ( Desk step three , models dos and 4). In the last action we calculated the the quantity to which affiliation and you can frequency exposures mediated the partnership ranging from competition/cultural class and you can internalized homophobia by examining the improvement in the brand new race/cultural classification coefficients whenever for each and every hypothesized mediator is set in the latest regression model. The outcomes mean mediation from the one another spiritual exposures of relationship between Latinos and you can internalized homophobia ( Table step 3 , patterns dos and 4). The new regression coefficients to your Latino adjustable diminished out of those individuals advertised into the Table 2 from the 20% and you will thirteen%, respectively, when we extra the fresh new association and you can volume exposures for the formula. In addition, introduction of mediators on design made the essential difference between Latinos and you may Whites to the internalized homophobia low-extreme. Out of notice, the alterations inside the coefficients was indeed higher having Blacks than Latinos, changing by the 50% and you can 25%, correspondingly ( Table 3 , designs 2 and you will 4). Therefore, whilst difference between internalized homophobia ranging from Blacks and you can Whites is perhaps not mathematically extreme, Blacks did enjoys large degrees of internalized homophobia than simply Whites and that it variation try reduced when the hypothesized mediators have been included in the patterns.
