Information for the 2011 nationwide domestic Survey Visible minority variable were released on May 8, 2013, as an element of a release that is integrated other ethnocultural and Aboriginal variables.
To learn more about and usage of 2011 NHS information, please relate to the Census Program internet site.
Information quality
The nationwide Household Survey (NHS) underwent a comprehensive information quality evaluation comparable to that which was done when it comes to 2011 Census of population and previous censuses. It contained an evaluation of numerous information quality indicators (such as for example reaction rate), and an assessment associated with general results, when compared with other information sources such as for example census of populace information.
Survey procedure
Quality indicators had been assessed and calculated at each one of the key actions associated with study. Through the collection and processing associated with the information, the high quality and persistence of this reactions supplied were examined because were the non-response prices. The caliber of the responses that are imputed examined following the conclusion associated with the control and imputation actions.
official Certification of last quotes
When information processing and imputation were finished, the information had been weighted to express the full total population that is canadian. These weighted information (the ultimate quotes) had been then certified to find out when they had been coherent and dependable when compared with other data sources that are independent. Here is the stage that is final of validation. The key features for this evaluation are presented below.
Non-response bias
As an example, in line with the quotes and styles through the sources stated earlier, evidence implies that the Filipino populace team is overestimated during the level that is national. The arab population group is suggested to be underestimated in the 2011 NHS on the other hand.
Generally speaking, the possibility of mistake increases for reduced degrees of geography as well as for smaller populations. The data sources used to evaluate these results are also less reliable making it difficult to certify these smaller counts at the same time.
Information quality indicators
Of all quality indicators utilized for the assessment, two are presented: the non-response that is global while the imputation price by concern.
| Provinces and regions | populace team (percent) |
|---|---|
| Canada | 3.9 |
Newfoundland and  Labrador |
4.2 |
| Prince Edward Island | 4.2 |
| Nova Scotia | 3.4 |
| Brand Brand New Brunswick | 3.5 |
| Quebec | 3.6 |
| Ontario | 4.2 |
| Manitoba | 3.7 |
| Saskatchewan | 3.5 |
| Alberta | 3.8 |
| Uk Columbia | 3.8 |
| Yukon | 4.4 |
| Northwest Territories | 3.3 |
| Nunavut | 4.9 |
Comparability along with other information sources
The nationwide domestic Survey (NHS) happens to be Statistics Canada’s main way to obtain information on populace team together with minority population that is visible. Just before 2011, the Census of Population accumulated info on these ideas. Other household studies ( e.g. , the General Social Survey) also gather information in the populace group and noticeable minority populace.
Many facets affect comparisons of populace team and noticeable minority populace information across these sources. Amongst other facets, comparability is afflicted with variations in study target populations, guide period, sampling and collection practices; concern wording, questionnaire structure, examples and directions; ways to information processing; the social and governmental environment at the full time of information collection. For more information, please see the National home Survey consumer Guide, Catalogue no. 99-001-X.
Is something no longer working? Will there be information outdated? Aren’t able to find what you are hunting for?
Please e mail us and write to us exactly how we are able to assist you to.
