Showing the most recent
CFPB v. Cash Advance Debt Solution
In December 2012, the CFPB, aided by the states of Hawaii, brand New Mexico, vermont, North Dakota and Wisconsin, sued the Payday Loan Debt Solution company for “violating state and federal credit card debt relief rules” by not supplying credit card debt relief solutions to clients whom paid charges. Payday Loan Debt Solution had been bought to refund $100,000 to clients…
CFPB v. National Legal Help Center; CFPB v. potential Edward Gordon d/b/a Gordon & Associates , Abraham Michael Pessar et al.
In 2012, the CFPB sued the nationwide Legal Help Center and potential Gordon along with his law practice, Gordon & Associates, for “loan modification frauds” that allegedly charged property owners to lessen their mortgage repayments with “little, if any, significant help to change property owners’ home mortgages or counter property property foreclosure,” which can be a “violation of federal legislation.”
CFPB – Discover Bank
In September 2012, the CFPB and FDIC issued a permission order to find Bank for misleading and pressuring clients into buying products that are add-on. Discover ended up being purchased to refund $200 million to around 3.5 million clients for presumably customers that are enrolling programs “without their permission, misled them in regards to the advantages and left clients thinking these products.
CFPB v. Meracord LLC, Linda Remsberg
In October 2013, the CFPB sued Meracord, a repayment processing business, for assisting “debt-relief companies enforce unlawful upfront fees.” Federal legislation forbids debt-relief organizations from getting re re payments before settling any debts, nevertheless the CFPB unearthed that Meracord presumably “processed at the least $11 million in illegal charges” from “more than 11,000 customers in the united states.”
CFPB – JPMorgan Chase Bank and Chase Bank United States Of America
In September 2013, the CFPB, in coordination utilizing the workplace associated with Comptroller associated with Currency (OCC), granted a consent order to JPMorgan Chase for “deceiving an incredible number of clients into purchasing expensive and services that are unneeded they enrolled in charge cards.” JPMorgan Chase ended up being purchased to refund $309 million to roughly 2.1 million clients.
CFPB v. Morgan Drexen, Inc. and Walter Ledda
In August 2013, the CFPB sued Morgan Drexen as well as its president, Walter Ledda, for presumably recharging upfront “illegal costs” to “more than 22,000 clients” to “help them resolve outstanding debts” as well as for presumably utilizing “false and deceptive marketing.” Morgan Drexen presumably deceived customers into “signing up for expensive bankruptcy-related solutions by telling them they might.
CFPB v. Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC., Matthew A. Pineda, and Buck L. Hawkins
In July 2013, the CFPB sued Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC., and its particular executives that are top Matthew Pineda and Buck Hawkins, for “paying unlawful bonuses to workers whom steered house purchasers toward higher-interest loans.” Castle & Cooke Mortgage allegedly went a “quarterly bonus system that paid $6,100 to $8,700 to loan officers whom persuaded customers.
CFPB – U.S. Bank Nationwide Association; CFPB – Dealers’ Monetary Services, LLC
In June 2013, the CFPB issued a consent order to U.S. Bank nationwide Association and Dealers’ Financial Services for misleading service that is”military whom took part in a car financing system.” The CFPB alleged that both companies “failed to isclose costs associated properly with repaying automobile financing’ meant to service users.” U.S Bank decided to repay.
CFPB – U.S. Bank Nationwide Association; CFPB – Dealers’ Monetary Services, LLC
In June 2013, the CFPB issued a permission order to U.S. Bank National Association and Dealers’ Financial Services for misleading service that is”military whom took part in an automobile financing system.” The CFPB alleged that both businesses “failed to isclose costs associated properly with repaying automotive loans’ meant to service users.” U.S Bank consented to repay.
CFPB – Ally Financial
In 2013, the CFPB, combined with https://samedayinstallmentloans.net/payday-loans-nh/ the Department of Justice, settled claims against Ally Financial for breaking “fair credit guidelines by charging you minority borrowers greater markups on automotive loans than white clients.” Ally decided to spend $98 million in restitution, with $80 million likely to customers in damages and another $18 million being a civil.
